AI visibility tools compared

Every established AI visibility platform — Profound, Peec AI, Otterly.AI, Scrunch, Conductor, RankPrompt, and the AI modules from Semrush and Ahrefs — is cloud-hosted subscription software where the vendor runs the queries for you and meters you by prompt volume, engines covered and seats. Self-serve entry tiers cluster around $29–$99 per month, the tier most teams actually need lands around $200–$500 per month, and enterprise is quote-only at every single vendor. AI Visibility Tracker is the outlier in kind rather than degree: a macOS desktop app for $29 once, no subscription, running on your own API key with your data on your own disk.

Last updated 2026-07-28

What does AI visibility tracking actually cost?

Between roughly $29 and $99 per month to start, and roughly $200 to $500 per month for a tier that covers enough prompts and engines to be useful — with every vendor in the category gating enterprise behind "Contact Sales" and publishing no price at all. The numbers below were read from each vendor's own pricing page on 28 July 2026.

Two things distort headline comparisons badly. Most of these pages display the annual price by default, so the month-to-month figure is 15–20% higher than what you first see. And several vendors charge extra per engine — so a plan advertising a low entry price may not include Claude or Gemini at all until you add them.

Published pricing, read from each vendor’s pricing page on 28 July 2026
ToolPricing modelEntry price as publishedEnterprise
AI Visibility TrackerOne-time purchase, no subscription$29 once (launch price, first 100 customers; $79 after), plus your own API usageNot offered — single-user desktop app
Otterly.AIMonthly subscription, per prompt volume$29/mo Lite (15 prompts); Claude and Gemini are paid add-onsQuote only
RankPromptMonthly subscription, credit-basedFrom ~$39/mo on the annual plan (150 credits)Quote only
Peec AIMonthly subscription, per prompt volume$80/mo annual or $95/mo monthly (50 prompts, 3 models)Quote only
ProfoundSubscription, per prompt volume and seats$99/mo Starter as displayed on annual billing (ChatGPT only, 50 prompts, 1 seat)Quote only
ScrunchMonthly subscription, per prompt volume and seats$250/mo annual or $300/mo monthly (350 custom prompts, 3 seats)Quote only
ConductorUsage-based, sales-ledNot publicly listed — no figures published on their pricing pageQuote only

Which AI engines does each tool cover?

Coverage varies more than the marketing suggests, and the differences are concentrated exactly where you would expect: Claude and Grok are the engines most often missing or charged as extras. Check the pricing page's comparison table rather than the homepage — several vendors name a broader set of engines on the homepage than any purchasable plan actually includes.

Engines covered, per each vendor’s own pricing documentation (28 July 2026)
ToolEngines covered
AI Visibility TrackerChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok — all five on every install, all in web-grounded mode
ProfoundUp to 9 answer engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI, DeepSeek and Google AI Overviews — but the entry tier is ChatGPT only
Peec AIChoose 3 of ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Perplexity and Gemini on paid tiers; Claude and others are Enterprise-only
Otterly.AIChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot included; Claude and Google AI Mode/Gemini are paid add-ons
ScrunchChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews, and Meta
RankPromptChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode/AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude and Grok
ConductorNames ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity specifically; the wider list is not published

Where does your data live, and who runs the queries?

In every commercial platform in this category, the vendor runs the queries on their own model access and stores the results on their infrastructure. None of them lets you bring your own LLM API key — billing is metered in prompts, answers or credits, which only works if the vendor controls the calls.

That is not a criticism; it is what makes them managed services, and it is why they can run your prompts at 3am whether or not your laptop is open. But it does mean your prompt set — a compact statement of which questions you think matter and which competitors you consider real — and your complete result history live on someone else's systems, under their retention policy. If that is a problem for you, it is a serious problem, and if it is not, it is not one at all.

Data location and query execution
AI Visibility TrackerEvery cloud platform in this category
Who runs the engine queriesYour machine, on your own API keyThe vendor, on their model access
Where results are storedLocal SQLite file on your disk, including every raw responseThe vendor’s cloud
API keysYours, encrypted with the OS keychain, never leave the deviceNot applicable — no BYOK option offered by any vendor found
TelemetryNoneVaries by vendor
Access if you stop payingEverything keeps working; the data is a file you ownAccess ends with the subscription
Compliance artefactsNone — no SOC 2, no SSO, no DPA needed since no data is sharedSOC 2 Type II and SSO available from several vendors, typically on enterprise tiers

Which one should you actually choose?

Pick by organisational shape rather than by feature count, because the feature lists converge and the operating models do not.

  • A marketing team with a budget, several people who need logins, and procurement requirements: a cloud platform. Profound and Conductor are built for that end; Scrunch and Peec serve mid-market and agencies well. Do not buy a desktop app to solve an organisational problem.
  • An agency tracking many client brands across markets: a platform with agency pricing and shared seats. Peec's unlimited seats and Otterly's per-prompt tiers both aim here.
  • A founder, solo marketer or small team tracking one brand or a handful: a desktop tool is usually the better fit, and $29 once versus $29 a month compounds quickly.
  • Anyone who needs crawler or agent analytics — how often AI bots fetch your pages, and what they do with them: that is a platform dataset. Profound and Scrunch both build on it and this app has no equivalent.
  • Anyone whose prompt set or competitor list is genuinely sensitive: local-first storage is the whole argument, and it is the one thing no cloud platform can offer at any price.

Are there other one-time or local-first options?

Yes, and it would be dishonest to imply otherwise. A free macOS utility called Ahoy Lighthouse runs local, bring-your-own-key AI visibility audits; an MIT-licensed open-source project, geo-aeo-tracker, does something similar in the browser with your keys held locally; and lifetime deals for cloud AI-visibility tools appear periodically on AppSumo, which is one-time pricing on hosted software rather than local-first.

What is accurate to say is narrower and still meaningful: every established, funded commercial platform in this category is cloud-hosted subscription software with vendor-run queries. The full picture, including where those alternatives are genuinely a better choice than paying us anything, is in AEO tracking without a subscription.

How should you verify any of this?

Competitor pricing below was read from each vendor’s own pricing page on 28 July 2026 and is quoted with the billing basis they display. Pricing in this category changes often — check the vendor’s page before making a decision on ours.

Prices in this category move quickly, tiers get renamed, and engines migrate between "included" and "add-on" without announcement. Third-party comparison articles are worse than useless here — the most widely repeated figure for one of these vendors is in the wrong currency and roughly double the current price. If a number matters to your decision, read it off the vendor's own page today.

Frequently asked questions

What is the cheapest way to track AI visibility?

Running the queries yourself on your own API key is the cheapest ongoing approach, because you pay providers at cost — typically a few cents a day for a core prompt set — instead of a subscription that marks that usage up. The tooling to do it is either free and rough (open-source projects), $29 once (AI Visibility Tracker), or $29+/month (the cheapest hosted tier, Otterly Lite, at 15 prompts).

Do any AI visibility tools let me use my own API key?

None of the established commercial platforms do — Profound, Peec, Otterly, Scrunch, Conductor and RankPrompt all run the queries themselves and meter you by prompts or credits. Bring-your-own-key is currently limited to local-first tools, including AI Visibility Tracker and a couple of free alternatives.

Is a $29/month tool the same as a $29 one-time tool?

Over one month, roughly. Over a year the subscription is $348 and the one-time purchase is still $29 plus your own API usage. The subscription buys managed infrastructure, runs that do not depend on your laptop being awake, and a web dashboard — which is worth the difference to some buyers and nothing at all to others.

Which AI visibility tool covers the most engines?

Profound publishes the broadest list at up to nine answer engines on its enterprise tier, including Copilot, Meta AI and DeepSeek that most others omit. Note that its entry tier covers ChatGPT only, so engine coverage and price are tightly linked across this whole category.

Related guides